The endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach is an effective technique commonly utilized for resection of sellar and parasellar lesions, such as pituitary adenomas, Rathke cleft cysts, craniopharyngiomas, and select meningiomas. Resultant skull base defects can be repaired effectively with free grafts and/or vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flaps (NSF) to prevent cerebrospinal fluid leaks, with excellent outcomes overall, or for coverage of critical neurovascular structures. The proximity of the surgical site during the approach (and donor site for the NSF) to olfactory mucosa raises concern for compromise of the olfactory mucosa, which, if not preserved, can drastically affect postoperative quality of life. Thus, consideration should be given to preservation of olfaction whenever possible during these approaches to minimize sinonasal morbidity. Considering the available evidence investigating olfaction after endoscopic pituitary resection, can the transsphenoidal approach be safely performed while preserving olfactory function? A prospective double-blinded randomized control trial was conducted in 2020 by Chou et al. to investigate postoperative olfaction among 31 patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery with or without NSF harvest.1 Half of these patients underwent skull base reconstruction using an NSF; of these, eight were randomized to flap harvest from the dominant olfaction side and the remaining six were randomized to the olfaction nondominant side. The control group patients did not undergo NSF harvest. UPSIT (University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test) scores between the control and treatment groups at 6 to 12 months postoperatively revealed no significant differences in olfactory function between the two groups (2.7-point decrease in UPSIT score in control group vs 1.7-point decrease in NSF group, P = .45). Their findings suggest that NSF use in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery does not pose a significant risk of hyposmia, nor does the side from which the flap is harvested appear to affect olfactory outcomes (2.3-point decrease on dominant side vs 1.2-point decrease on nondominant side, P = .79). Similarly, Chaaban et al. prospectively studied 18 patients undergoing endoscopic transnasal pituitary surgery.2 UPSIT scores preoperatively and 3 to 4 months postoperatively were not statistically significant, including those patients who underwent skull base reconstruction using NSFs. New hyposmia occurred in only 1.5% of all patients who preoperatively reported normal olfactory function. Normosmia was maintained in 95.8% of patients at 3 months and 95.1% of patients at 1 year post-surgery. Preoperative (31.3 ± 0.4) and postoperative (30.5 ± 0.5) UPSIT scores—with patients serving as their own controls—were not significantly different (P = .54). Those who underwent NSF harvest had scores similar to those patients who did not (29.4 ± 1.1 vs 28.6 ± 1.3, P = .87). Work by Harvey et al. demonstrates that there is also evidence suggesting an anatomically oriented basis for preservation of olfaction. Outcomes were measured using the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) in 98 patients undergoing surgery with purposeful olfactory preservation by minimizing dissection of the “olfactory strip,” which is located in the posterosuperior septum adjacent to the superior turbinate.3 The patients were grouped into pituitary resection (N = 40) and sinonasal tumor resection (N = 58), of which the latter group did not undergo NSF harvest. Preoperative scores were compared to those at 1 and 6 months after surgery. Their results suggested that SNOT-22 scores were actually improved between baseline and 6-months postoperatively in the pituitary resection group (P = .046), and there was no difference in UPSIT scores between these two time points (P = .68). Olfactory fibers can extend down over the medial surface of the superior turbinate, a structure which must be either resected or otherwise manipulated for full access to the skull base in transsphenoidal surgery. Given concern for surgical compromise of these olfactory fibers when the superior turbinate is partially resected, Li et al. performed a retrospective cohort study to compare olfactory function after either partial resection (PRST) or intentional lateralization of the superior turbinate (ILST) on the right.4 They measured their outcomes using the Sniffin' Sticks threshold test and the Sniffin' Sticks 12-Item Identification Test (SIT-12). At 6 months postoperatively, there was a significantly lower score on the threshold test in the partial resection group compared to the lateralization group (9.0 in PRST vs 10.0 in ILST, P = .036); however, SIT-12 scores at this same time point were not significantly different (9.0 in both groups, P = .325). Postoperative worsening of olfaction as compared to preoperative scores was similar in both groups (21.6% in PRST and 16.2% in ILST, P = .401). They therefore concluded that partial resection of the superior turbinate did not portend an increased risk of olfactory dysfunction. Finally, Pucinelli et al. performed a prospective cohort study to determine olfactory preservation among 22 patients undergoing septal incisions for posterior septectomy and/or NSF harvest during skull base surgery using cold knife (n = 10) or monopolar electrocautery (n = 12).5 This study is based on the hypothesis that cautery may lead to thermal conduction to the surrounding olfactory fibers, which may adversely affect olfactory outcomes. Their comparisons of preoperative, 3- and 12-month postoperative UPSIT (P > .80 at all time points) and SNOT-22 (P > .22 at all time points) scores revealed no significant differences between the two treatment groups. This suggests a similar safety profile for these two techniques for upper septal limb incisions in long-term olfactory preservation. In the case of endoscopic transsphenoidal skull base surgery, routine and purposeful preservation of olfactory function is possible, even with dissection and manipulation of relevant anatomical structures (i.e., superior turbinate and septum) for access, and regardless of use of cold knife or electrocautery for dissection in this area (Table I). The duration of transient olfactory dysfunction is not widely specified but improvement appears to occur reliably by 6 months on average. Furthermore, the use of NSF in reconstruction after skull base surgery has not been shown to increase the risk of postoperative hyposmia or anosmia. There remains a need for future studies focused on olfactory preservation in more extensive skull base approaches for lesions extending beyond the sella and sphenoid sinus, with possible risk of compromising larger portions of olfactory mucosa. Furthermore, maintaining the head in a flexed position and favoring a low approach to the sella are techniques that can be employed to protect the mucosa in wider resections. No significant differences in olfaction scores at 3–4 months postoperatively as compared to preoperative baseline No significant differences in olfaction scores between those with and without NSF harvest Improvement in quality-of-life scores at 6 months between baseline and 6-months postoperatively in patients who underwent pituitary resection group No significant differences in olfaction scores as compared to preoperative baseline Conclusions are based on a randomized control trial1 (level 1 evidence), prospective cohort studies2, 3, 5 (level 2 evidence), and a retrospective cohort study4 (level 3 evidence).